Embassy cables reveal 34 nations pressured by UK to oppose Scottish independence

Featured

passport_photo_biggerChristian Wright says: No one who would pressure 34 foreign powers to defame us and demean us should ever be in a position to rule over us.”

 

Update: Obama’s anodyne “endorsement” of the British Union on June 6 was scripted according to the Financial Times Chief Foreign Affairs Correspondent 

“Those remarks from Obama on Scotland were not spontaneous. Came after an informal request from No 10.”

We Ourselves have additionally been told that the question that prompted the reply, was asked by a BBC journalist at the specific request of the Prime Minister’s Office.

And this just in from SKYNEWS by way of secondary corroboration skynews

“A US government source claims the president’s remarks on Scottish independence followed a direct request from the UK government.”

Diplomatic cables reveal the extent of the British Government’s collusion with foreign powers to damage the Scottish Government, undermine international confidence in Scotland’s economy, and to usurp the democratic process of the referendum on independence.34 govts pressured

The lid’s been blown clean off the UK Government’s anti-Scotland covert operation, and exposed the utter hypocrisy and mendacity of David Cameron.

Official diplomatic cables prove conclusively that even as Cameron told the country the choice was up to the Scottish people and that he would play no part in it, he was pressuring other nations leaders, including Russia’s Putin, to make statements that would undermine the case for Scotland’s ability to sustain itself, and to promote the meme of Scots dependence on the Union.

The diplomatic cables reveal the Devolution Unit, meant to assist the Scottish Government’s transactions with foreign governments, is functioning as a hostile covert agency of Cameron’s government.

‘The Devolution Unit, created by the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) in 2012 to deliver abroad the “utmost co-operation”, now appears to be at the heart of Westminster’s anti-independence drive, amassing hostile reactions from overseas”, says the Sunday Herald.

“… [T]he FCO has contacted the governments of China, Russia, the US, New Zealand, Australia, Canada and the 28 EU nations about the Scottish referendum in a global search for allies who might oppose independence.

One recent cable showed UK embassies being ordered to forward a Westminster paper critical of independence “to their host governments and other local contacts” and then feed their comments back to the Devolution Unit “ASAP”.’

The most damaging aspect of these revelations is the extent to which Cameron, his ministers and the civil service he controls, have perpetrated one bare-faced lie after another. Lied to the Scottish people, lied to the Scottish Government, lied to parliaments in both London and Edinburgh.

This whole orchestrated fiction of non-interference has been shattered, and the depth of Unionist subterfuge, secret deals and collusion, has been thoroughly exposed to public scrutiny.

Now, given Mr Cameron’s penchant for lying at the drop of a hat, what other intrigues to subvert the electoral process remain to be discovered?

What other dirty tricks have he and his government yet to pull? Just how far are they prepared to go to usurp the democratic process they are sworn and legally bound to uphold?

The question for the Scottish electorate is: How do you trust a proven liar?

 

WITCH HUNT

By Christian Wright

The Unionist’s have embarked on a coordinated attack against those ordinary folks who champion the cause of an independent Scotland.

In the vanguard of this jihad is the Daily Mail, whose patrons you will recall, are distinguished by their many crayoned statements of encouragement, that we Scots scroungers should eat our fried Mars Bars, STFU, and get the frak out.

To its usual racist fair this bastion of intolerance and bigotry is now targeting individual citizens who dare speak their mind in public fora. In a series of defamatory articles this week it has printed personal information to include the location, employment, marital status, children, parents, and photographs, of their victims whose only crime has been to espouse a political view with which this rabidly Unionist propaganda machine disagrees.

The power of all DM’s formidable resources have been brought to bear upon these ordinary individuals in an effort to frighten them into silence by harassing them on their own doorstep, then eviscerating their character in print.

Subsequent articles make it plain that this is meant to be a warning to other Scots who would dare speak out, even to the extent of threatening to set the law on them.

Below is and example of this disgraceful assault courtesy of Wings Over Scotland whose creator is one other targets. In an eye-opening expose, the full gore of this slice’n’dice is laid bare.

The perpetrator of this GBH is the bespectacled Graham Grant Graham Grant

CYBERNATS UNMASKED

“A retired oil executive, a jobless man of 41 who lives with his mum and a Bath-based video games writer. Meet just some of the agitators whose online poison is shaming the Nationalists”

‘Spilling endless bile and vitriol onto Twitter’

“HUNCHED in front of the flickering computer screen, Brendan Hynes is hard at work, despite the late hour. The divorced father of three has a look of intense concentration as his fingers race across the keyboard.”

And on and on.  {DM article quotes were courtesy of WOS}

Now surely what’s sauce for the goose in sauce for the gander. Where does this sort of approach lead us?

Where does the author of this scurrilous defamatory article live? Clearly he thinks the public has a right to know – at least the right to know the location of others whom he targets for abuse.

With whom does he live? Does he live alone? If he does, what does that say about him? Where was HE born? Would he think it fine were belligerent strangers to bang on his door or otherwise invade his privacy and demand answers to personal questions?

Make no mistake about it, this crawling thing and his employer are engaged in a witch hunt.

What is his marital status? Has he ever been unemployed? Has he ever lived with his mother?. Has he ever been divorced? Has he ever been in receipt of state benefit? Will he have a vote in the referendum?

How would such information be relevant unless your goal is to injure and defame?

Why would not having a vote disqualify advocacy for these good people but not for the Prime Minister of Spain, or the President of Russia, from whom Cameron has begged comment favourable to the Unionist cause?

Are these pro-indy citizens-second-class unlike George Osborne, not eligible to air their opinions?

Neither Cameron nor his Chancellor live in Scotland, neither will have a vote, yet both insist in putting their oar in, and have begged the help of foreign governments to comment in support of their Unionist campaign

How far did Grant go in his zeal to defame? Did he or anyone else involved in the construction of this potentially dangerous polemic, violate any privacy law or governing code of press ethics in the gathering any of the personal information made public?

Particularly troubling was Grant’s inclusion of information about the age and sex of an innocent child and of a frail and vulnerable elderly person victimised in this deliberately provocative piece; a piece that is clearly designed to rouse the ire of those inadequates who share the author’s extreme views and penchant for thuggery. A piece that could easily put his victims and their innocent loved-ones in harms way.

This isn’t journalism, nor the work of an ethical man, nor even a rat, for there are some things you just can’t get a rat to do.